writer, broadcaster, portfolio woman

Restore sanity in the debate on drugs

The Independent, November 1st 2010

Every year, 750,000 Americans are arrested for possessing small amounts of cannabis: a waste of time and money

America declared war on drugs 40 years ago. You’d think that by now, it might have won. Instead, any US teenager can buy cannabis, at higher strength and at a lower price. Meanwhile, severed heads are rolled across floors in Mexican discos and innocent people are scared to leave their homes in cities such as Ciudad Juarez, where the war on drugs has taken its highest toll.

Joseph McNamara is the retired police chief of San Jose. Writing in the San Francisco Chronicle, he says:”Like an increasing number of law enforcers, I have learned that most bad things about marijuana, especially the violence made inevitable by an obscenely profitable black market, are caused by the prohibition, not by the plant.”

McNamara has been fronting a TV campaign for Proposition 19. When Californians go to the polls tomorrow in the US mid-term elections, they will also vote on this proposition, allowing cannabis to be legalised, regulated and taxed in the state. The “yes” campaign has been boosted by a $1 million donation from the billionaire financier George Soros, and its supporters are energised. Thousands descended on Washington at the weekend to take part in the comedian Jon Stewart’s Rally to Restore Sanity.

Sanity is exactly what is needed in America’s approach to drugs. As Abraham Lincoln said in 1840, “A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded.” The principles of liberty and the pursuit of happiness are certainly infringed by laws that punish adults for lighting up in the privacy of their own home. But, principles aside, it’s not as if prohibition has even worked.

The International Centre for Science in Drug Policy has recently published two devastating research papers. In one, it found an extremely strong link between anti-drug law enforcement policies and rises in drug-related crime, murder and gun violence. You can see the evidence in Mexico: since President Calderon launched his “war on drugs” against the cartels in 2006, some 28,000 people have been killed. The other study shows that the surge in US anti-drug funding between 1990 and 2007 has utterly failed in its purpose. In that time, the strength of cannabis has increased โ€“ there has been a 145 per cent rise in its active ingredient, THC. And its price, after inflation, has fallen by 58 per cent. Meanwhile, 80-90 per cent of Americans in their last year of high school say it is “very easy” or “fairly easy” to obtain.

Quite apart from the violence, look at the harm prohibition does. Every year, some 750,000 Americans are arrested for possession of small quantities of cannabis. That is a waste of time and money for the police and the criminal justice system. Meanwhile, black and Hispanic citizens are more likely to be arrested for possession of marijuana, even though white people are more likely to smoke it. So prohibition does nothing for race relations.

A study by the libertarian Cato Institute has calculated that legalising cannabis would save $8.7bn in the costs of policing and criminal justice and raise another $8.7bn in tax revenue. In California alone, where marijuana is the state’s biggest cash crop, legalisation would save about $1.4bn and raise another $1.4bn. In a state with a $19bn budget deficit, that’s a tidy sum.

The advantage of legalising and regulating, rather than simply decriminalising, is that the production and sale of cannabis is taken out of the hands of organised crime and given to legal producers and suppliers. Given that Mexican drug cartels earn 60 per cent of their revenue from cannabis, this could have a dramatic effect.

But it also means that quality and strength can be regulated. Many users don’t want to fry their brains with skunk; they would prefer a milder high from cannabis with a lower THC content. When sold on the street wrapped in clingfilm, its strength is much harder to judge than when it’s legally produced and sold in a reputable shop. Outlets could also insist on proof of age โ€“ Proposition 19 would make cannabis legal only for those over 21.

But what about the dangers of cannabis? Well, first, it’s not clear that legalisation would increase consumption. Countries with lax drug regimes don’t have more drug-taking than strict ones. Portugal decriminalised cannabis in 2001 and, after a small increase in the first two years, adolescent use of cannabis has been in decline ever since. The Netherlands, with its permissive approach, has a lower rate of consumption than Britain. Even if Proposition 19 did encourage more Californians to smoke weed, that would probably be at the expense of drinking alcohol. It’s no surprise, then, that the California Beer and Beverage Distributors Association is one of the biggest backers of the “no” campaign.

Would a slight shift from alcohol to cannabis be such a bad thing? Alcohol is implicated in far more crime and anti-social behaviour than cannabis. It leads to far more disease and injury. It is far more addictive. Yes, skunk has been known to lead to psychotic episodes in young people already predisposed to schizophrenia; but there is also such a thing as alcohol-induced psychosis. Neither drug is harmless, but scientists rank cannabis below both alcohol and tobacco in the damage it causes. And under Proposition 19, driving under the influence would remain illegal and employers could still prohibit employees from working while stoned.

So what are the chances of it passing? Recent polls show the two sides are neck-and-neck. But what’s interesting is that 90 per cent of Californians under 30 who are likely to vote are aware of the Proposition. Many Democrats believe that these young people, who may have been motivated to turn out by the prospect of legalising pot, will vote for Democrat candidates at the same time.

Not that this is an entirely partisan issue any more. Surprising numbers of Republicans are supporting legalisation, either on libertarian grounds or because of the money it could raise and save. Even Glenn Beck, the Tea Party-supporting shock jock, came out in favour earlier this year. And Sarah Palin questioned whether police should be wasting their time on it. Gary Johnson, the Republican former governor of New Mexico and a possible presidential candidate in 2012, has said, “Proposition 19 has the opportunity to be the domino that could bring about rational drug policy nationwide.”

If anything, it is easier for a Republican to say this sort of thing. In public, at least, Democrat politicians are still wary of associating themselves with legalisation. In private, though, many Democrat strategists will be watching the vote carefully. In the 2008 presidential election, there was a big increase in turnout among young people, and they backed Barack Obama over John McCain by a factor of two to one. If Proposition 19 helps to energise the youth vote this year, expect many more states to have cannabis legalisation on the ballot in 2012. In that case, President Obama may well owe his re-election to the legacy of Cheech and Chong.

29 Responses to “Restore sanity in the debate on drugs”

  1. Bonusy says:

    bless Google that I found you ๐Ÿ™‚

  2. DMV Virginia says:

    you really inspire me to make more of my own trade. your creative spirit is contagious. many thanks

  3. Hello ? very good website you have produced. We loved reading this publishing. Used to do want to write the comment to tell you that the design of the website is extremely great looking. I had been a artist, right now I am a copy publisher. I have usually enjoyed dealing with computer systems as well as am trying to learn code in my spare time.

  4. Great blog!! You should start many more. I love all the info provided. I will stay tuned ๐Ÿ™‚

  5. optiver says:

    My wife agrees with me, we feel this is quite a nice blog and a helpful resource. Thanks for sharing, keep it up.

  6. CNA Training says:

    This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!

  7. Paola Quaas says:

    Really nice post,thank you, best website ever

  8. sdfasfasfasf says:

    Really great posting, informative , already shared with friends ๐Ÿ˜‰ looking forward to next post

  9. I have been searching for content such as this for my research project I am working on. Thanks very much.

  10. cats says:

    I discovered your blog last week and started follow your posts religiously. I have not commented on any blog just yet but I was thinking I would love to. Itโ€™s really exciting to actually contribute to a article even if itโ€™s only a blog. I really donโ€™t know exactly what to write other than I really enjoyed reading through 2 of the articles. Nice articles indeed. I sure will keep visiting your blog weekly. I learned quite a bit from you. Thx!

  11. Rena Whiddon says:

    I love your website! did you create this yourself or did you outsource it? Im looking for a blog design thats similar so thats the only reason Iโ€™m asking. Either way keep up the nice work I was impressed with your content really…

  12. Couldnt agree more with that, very attractive article

  13. kredyt says:

    I am through with the Democrats and the Republicans. I am emailing the link to this blog to everyone I can think of, including the White House. I know they donโ€™t read emails, but hey, itโ€™s the principle of the thing.

  14. Beneficial info and excellent design you got here! I want to thank you for sharing your ideas and putting the time into the stuff you publish! Great work!

  15. Dry Shampoo says:

    Hey, I’m impressed this is written from a very interesting perspective. You’re either really close to this or an author.

  16. Hello ! I have to write that this blog post is excellent, well written and contains all needed info. Reading this post Was pleasure for me ๐Ÿ™‚

  17. You completed some fine points there. I did a search on the theme and found a good number of persons will go along with with your blog.

  18. pell grants says:

    Nice site, nice and easy on the eyes and great content too.

  19. Lise Doak says:

    wow ,COOL , I like this post. Thanks.

  20. I really like the theme on your blog, I run a WordPress website , and I would like to use this theme. Anyway you can tell me what its called?

  21. I love the theme you are using, I run a website too, and I would really love to use this theme. Is it a free style, or is it custom?

  22. get taller says:

    Hello all ! I want to comment that this blog post is totally superb, well describes the topic and have all important informations. Reading this post Was pleasure for me ๐Ÿ™‚

  23. Richard Alt says:

    Remember to excuse our use of English, I’m just learning. I very much like your blog greatly, I think it is very interesting also I saved a bookmark in my own computer history.

  24. get taller says:

    Hello,good blog post. Informations are really useful and saves me huge amount of time which I spend on something else instead of googling ๐Ÿ™‚ Thanks and waiting for more posts like this one.

  25. Hugh Smith says:

    Brilliantly written post, thanks!

  26. pell grants says:

    Wow this is a great resource.. Iโ€™m enjoying it.. good article

Leave a Reply